Deploy Containers Close to Your Users

This Engineering Education (EngEd) Program is supported by Section.

Instantly deploy containers globally. Section is affordable, simple and powerful.

Get Started for Free.

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

June 30, 2021

Now, more than ever, businesses need to optimize the use of digital systems to store and manage their data. The move is an integral part of ensuring risks stemming from poor data management are minimized or eradicated. Such risks may include access to inaccurate data, data loss, unauthorized access, and revenue loss.


An entity can get into trouble with the law over how it handles its data in rare scenarios. Some laws govern the use of personal data that organizations must comply with, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that will become the most influential data protection legislation worldwide.

Therefore, it is crucial to employ efficient and more reliable data management systems to facilitate smooth business operations within an organization. Such systems include PostgreSQL and MySQL.

Both PostgreSQL and MySQL are free and open-source data management systems. Therefore, they allow modification of source codes to accommodate the specifications and preferences of the user.

These systems make it possible for companies to develop unique digital ways of recording, accessing, transferring, and modifying data. As a result, businesses can build safe information storage systems that conform to their set standards.

PostgreSQL, just like MySQL, is a relational data management system (RDMS). The two RDBMS store logical data separate from physical data. These are stored in tables, which are also called relations.

The arrangement makes it possible for the user to manage physical data without causing any access trouble to data stored in the logical structures. A user, for example, can change the name of a stored file without altering its contents. In addition, relational data management systems make it easier to handle multitudes of ‘related’ data.

PostgreSQL was first released in 1996, while MySQL made its release a year earlier. The existence of the databases for two decades and a half has garnered impressive popularity for them.

Leading tech giants and business conglomerates employ the systems in their data management. In addition, some organizations use the two systems within their entities and subsidiaries. However, most entities prefer one of the data management systems over the other for their reasons.

Features of PostgreSQL

A good number of operating systems are compatible with PostgreSQL. These include Windows OS, Solaris, FreeBSD, Linux, UNIX, Android, and OS X.

The RDBMS, written in C, boasts of programming interfaces for languages C, C++, Python, Java, JavaScript, Delphi, and Perl. Other languages it supports include Ruby, Tcl, Go, Lisp, Erlang, .NET, and Open Database Connectivity (ODBC).

Managing data for operations with heavy analysis is more accessible with PostgreSQL. It is an object-relational database, hence includes features like function overloading where one feature can do multiple tasks and inherit tables where properties of one table can be ‘inherited’ in another table.

It also supports materialized views so that users can save a Structured Query Language (SQL) query on analysis on a disc as a physical table. This increases the order of magnitude speeds of complex SQL queries. As a result, the queries can interact more effectively with other SQL queries.

The performance of PostgreSQL was also improved by its index design. An index is a structure or object that helps speed up the retrieval of specific data. It facilitates a comparatively quicker execution of CRUD (Create Read Update Delete) activities.

The RDBMS also offers partial, bitmap, and expression indexes. Partial Indexes are used in situations where the need arises to only index part of a table. Bitmap indexing is used in situations where an index may return more than one result.

Under expression, indexes are not built on a functional index on a table field but an arbitrary expression. Here, if the expression’s computation is costly, then more resources will be required to operate.

Heavy analysis with PostgreSQL feels even lighter with the wide range of triggers the system offers. These are events that set a course of action in motion. For example, if you would like to take action on a specific database event, such as inserting or updating a record, then trigger functionality can be helpful as it will invoke the required function on defined events.

PostgreSQL ensures the security of user’s data with a robust access control system. In addition, the RDBMS possesses the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) often used for authentication and storing information about users, groups, and applications and Generic Security Service Application Program Interface (GSSAPI) a security framework that enables applications to protect their transmitted data.

It also brings to the table the SCRAM-SHA-256, a framework for authentication in connection-oriented protocols and the Security Support Provider Interface which provides a mechanism by which a distributed application can call one of several security providers to obtain an authenticated connection.

PostgreSQL also has disaster recovery features that include Point in Time Recovery (PITR), tablespaces, and Write-Ahead Logging (WAL). It also supports Synchronous, Asynchronous and Logical replications.

PostgreSQL is also fully ACID compliant (Atomicity Consistency Isolation Durability).

Features of MySQL

MySQL is a fast database for read-heavy data writes. It is an incredible choice for managing simple but bulk data projects. It is written in C and C++, and supports the languages C, C++, Perl, Java, PHP, Python, and Tcl.

MySQL applications can be developed on major operating systems, including Windows, Symbian, HP-UX, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Linux, and macOS.

MySQL supports Open Database Connectivity ODBC, a widely accepted application programming interface (API) for database access. With ODBC, an application can access different database management systems with the same source code.

Just like PostgreSQL, MySQL supports replication in case of a hardware change. This also makes database queries faster.

The database supports InnoDB formats, which facilitates transactions in the system. The InnoDB formats also allow the creation of InnoDB tables. In addition, MySQL supports foreign key constraints for these tables, eliminating unwanted cross-references in linked tables.

The database is also equipped with JSON data validation, which rejects invalid JSON data from being entered into your projects.

MySQL facilitates an easier transition to a new password in codes by supporting dual passwords for the entered data. As a result, a user does not need to edit an entire application when updating the password.

MySQL features include support for multi-version concurrency control, multi-threads using Kernel Threads, and huge data capability. For example, the ANSI SQL standard database can handle rows exceeding 50 million.

Below is a table summarizing features of the two databases as discussed above

PostgreSQL MySQL
Highly compatible with a good number of operating systems. Highly compatible with a good number of operating systems.
Easier to Manage data for operations with heavy analysis using PostgreSQL. It’s a fast and incredible choice for managing simple but bulk data projects.
Improved performance due to its index design. Facilitates transition to a new password in codes by supporting dual passwords.
Powerful access control system which ensures the security of user’s data. Supports multi-version concurrency control, multi-threads using Kernel Threads, and massive data capability.
Disaster recovery features, which include PITR and WAL. It’s faster than PostgreSQL but less powerful.

ProstreSQL Vs. MySQL


Determining the better choice between the two databases depends on the user. Both PostgreSQL and MySQL get the job done with a clean finish on a primary data management level.

They are both competitive data management systems with outstanding features. However, developers conversant with the two find the more popular MySQL faster and more efficient than PostgreSQL.

On the other hand, it scores under on complex analytics and concurrence than PostgreSQL. While MySQL is faster, PostgreSQL is more powerful. A Google trend analysis indicates a drop in interest in MySQL over time. This is an indication that more developers are looking for alternative database management solutions.

Further reading

Peer Review Contributions by: Lalithnarayan C